Recent research by Russell Investments, based on Australian
Bureau of Statistics figures, shows 41 per cent of full-time
workers expect to shift to part-time work before retiring, while 20
per cent don't expect to retire at
all.
The significance of this for fund managers is that both groups
will continue to pour money into super for many years to come.
For those over 55, part- or full-time work provides an
opportunity for the re-contribution to super from money earned.
A Newspoll survey shows 43 per cent of baby boomers expect to
work past 65, with 57 per cent of middle-income earners citing
financial need as the main reason.
Higher income earners say they want to continue working because
they enjoy it. They reject the long-standing view of retirement and
want to change down a gear, enjoying other interests while
remaining in the workforce.
Russell analysed the figures to demonstrate the benefits of
working longer.
A couple with a joint income of $85,000 who save until 60 before
retiring with an income of $50,000 a year (with the woman assumed
to have had 10 years out of the workforce), and who draw down from
their $500,000 super balance at 60, will run out of money when they
reach 79.
The same couple, having reduced their working hours to 60 per
cent between age 60 and 65, will have $600,000 in the super kitty
at retirement.
They will be able to draw down $50,000 a year until they reach
95.
That extra five years of part-time work, at two-thirds their
previous pace adds 15 years to their draw-down phase.
Of course, not everyone can reduce their working hours and stay
in the job they have. Many others would like to work but find
themselves on the scrap heap much earlier.
They face being interviewed for jobs by 23-year-old recruiters
who have no real understanding of what workers who don't look in
the peak of youth can contribute. All they see are dinosaurs.
There is a mature-age employment agency that may help.
XMSolutions.com.au - set up by Sam Leon, a former insurance
salesman and motivation consultant - specialises in matching
over-45s with employers looking for skilled older people.
For now, job applicants join the service free, although later
there will be a small charge to cover the cost of processing CVs,
arranging profiles online and conducting interviews.
Prospective employers pay $3000 for 12 months' access to the
site of job applicant listings, which is a significant discount to
the 17 to 20 per cent of the first year's pay that employment
agencies commonly charge.
There is also the option of a $650 charge for a month's access
to the job applicant skills database.
Leon sees his market as over-45s who want to work part-time or
full-time but are disillusioned by their experiences with
conventional recruitment firms. They will be able to market their
skills to employers who are looking for their experience and
expertise.
"They have a great deal of experience and are good mentors to
younger staff," he says.
At present, the website deals with white-collar skills but
eventually Leon expects to cover blue-collar skills.
As he says, there is a skills shortage. And a lot of laid-off
and redundant employees want to find work.
This is one way of bringing the two together. And for them to
ensure that they can draw down their retirement kitty until they
are 94.