The Federal Government has let the gearing genie out of the
superannuation bottle. Restrictions on borrowing by super funds
have come to an end following changes to the law. Super has been
subject to some big changes over the years - and this one is right
up there.
An amendment to the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act last
year was designed to clarify the law covering internally geared
derivatives such as instalment warrants.
Yet it went much further than expected and established the right
of funds to borrow to invest in any asset they would otherwise be
allowed to buy outright.
The main beneficiaries of this change will be the trustees of
the country's 370,000 self-managed super funds, who can now gear
into property.
This change was a surprise to almost everyone in the industry
and has led to a flurry of product development aimed at providing
funds with gearing options.
At this stage no one knows whether it is a good genie or a bad
one.
The Australian Taxation Office has cautioned trustees of
self-managed super funds to be careful about the types of loan
arrangements they get into.
In a taxpayer alert issued last week, the Tax Office said
trustees had to ensure that in entering into a loan contract they
did not breach provisions of the Act that prohibit the acquisition
of in-house assets. It emphasised the sole purpose of
superannuation investment is to accumulate benefits for use in
retirement.
Before the change, super fund trustees were able to borrow in a
limited way through structured vehicles that were internally
geared, such as instalment warrants and other equity derivatives,
and geared managed funds.
Several boutique fund managers had devised geared property
investment products that used a similar structure to instalment
warrants. One of those was Calliva Group, which launched a product
called SuperAccess in June.
Under the terms of the scheme, Calliva would purchase 70 per
cent of the value of a commercial property.
The super fund subscribed for a property note, which represented
the balance of the purchase. The note included a right to buy the
property outright at any time.
On settlement of the transaction, the property was held by a
trust company. The super fund entered into a lease with the trust
company and the super fund, then sublet the property to a tenant.
Any excess of gross rent received over interest outgoing was
applied to reduce the funding.
Calliva launched the product after getting a favourable product
ruling from the Tax Office and a letter from the taxman stating
that the funding arrangement did not breach the Act's prohibition
on borrowing.
Calliva was not the only group with such a scheme. A Babcock
& Brown offshoot, SPI Plan, produced a property warrant that
allowed super funds to gear into its property developments and a
group called Quantum Warrants, a subsidiary of daVinci Funds
Management, had a similar product.
These have been overtaken by events.
Last year's amendment removed the focus on instalment warrants
that had been in the legislation. It established the broader
principal referred to above, that funds could borrow to invest in
assets they otherwise could buy outright.
Now lenders are free to offer arrangements that resemble
conventional lending products.
Westpac, which entered the market in March, simply modified the
terms of a couple of existing commercial loans.
Lending to a super fund is not exactly the same as lending to an
individual. The money borrowed must be used for the purchase of an
asset.
As the loan is being repaid, the asset must be held in trust
with a security trustee and the super fund has a beneficial
interest in any income, interest or capital gains from the asset.
When the loan is paid out, ownership can be transferred to the
super fund.
If the asset is residential property, the fund members cannot
live in it. If it is commercial property, they could lease it as
long as rent was struck on a commercial basis.
The existing assets of the fund have to be protected from loss
if the loan goes bad.
Loans must be non-recourse, which means that if the borrower
defaults, the lender can take possession of the property being
offered as security but no other assets of the fund. In this way
the rights of the lender against the fund for default are limited
to the security.
Lenders can ask the members of the fund to give personal
guarantees, which means the lender could recover assets held
outside super if the loan goes bad.
Some lenders, such as Macquarie, include a security trustee in
the loan package. Others, such as Westpac and Seiza Capital, do
not. Some law firms, including Gadens, have started businesses that
set up a security trustee for borrowers.
Lenders and self-managed super fund trustees are happy with
these changes but many people within the super industry are not.
The Government has heard from a number of sources that opening the
door to super fund borrowing in this way is a mistake.
Speaking at an industry conference last month, the Minister for
Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry, said:
"Sophisticated financial investment instruments are increasingly
being marketed to SMSFs. I also note that SMSFs had a high exposure
to Westpoint [a failed finance company], which raises risk and
diversification issues. It is the responsibility of the Government
to monitor this area and we will continue to keep a close watch on
the marketing of any sophisticated products to SMSFs."
The Tax Office says it would be concerned about loans advanced
by related parties at rates higher or lower than commercial
rates.
It says: "Money advanced by a member or related party at greater
than a commercial interest rate may result in a breach of the sole
purpose test, on the basis that the excessive interest rate may
mean that the SMSF is not being maintained for the sole purpose of
providing super benefits." The Tax Office also says it would be
concerned if interest on a super loan was capitalised.
One issue that will worry lenders relates to personal
guarantees. Several lenders with products in the market, including
Westpac and Seiza Capital, require the members of the fund to give
personal guarantees. The Tax Office says a regulatory issue would
arise if the personal guarantee resulted in recourse being made to
any assets of the super fund.
Gadens Lawyers partner Jon Denovan says personal guarantees are
legitimate. "Superannuation legislation does not regulate the
members, only the fund."
Denovan says a problem would arise if the fund member giving the
personal guarantee then sued the fund to recover lost assets. He
says loan contracts would have to be written to exclude this
possibility.
One critic of the change to gearing rules is Pauline Vamos, the
chief executive of the Association of Superannuation Funds of
Australia.
"We recognise that the flexibility offered by SMSFs is a good
thing for lots of people," she says. "But we want to make sure that
when SMSF trustees go into these products they balance the risk of
taking on debt against their retirement needs."
Macquarie Adviser Services executive director David Shirlow says
the anti-borrowing argument is illogical. "If you are going to
control gearing, you have to do so on a look-through basis. It does
not make any sense to impose controls on one form of geared
investment and not on another."
Yet Vamos argues that an important difference between a geared
fund and a loan is that the geared fund is an investment product
that must be sold by way of the product disclosure statement that
has been vetted by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission and sold by a licensed financial planner. "It is a very
different regulatory structure to a commercial loan," she says.
Loan brokers have started signing up to sell self-managed super
fund loans. They see the new loan packages as a way of
supplementing their dwindling mortgage businesses.
Seiza Capital managing director Simon Robinson says his group
has signed up a number of brokers to sell the product it launched
in February, the Self Managed Super Fund Loan.
One of those brokers is Queensland's Allstate Home Loans.
Allstate managing director Tony Shield is expecting a slowdown in
mortgage sales and is looking for a change to Allstate's product
mix.
Mortgage broker Firstfolio has signed up with Calliva Group and
will sell its SuperAccess property investment loan to SMSF
clients.
The prospect of loan brokers setting up gearing arrangements for
SMSF trustees worries some people.
Denovan says he supports the right of self-managed super fund
trustees to borrow to acquire an asset of their choice for their
fund and also choose the level of gearing that is appropriate for
their risk tolerance.
He says the alternative, geared funds, often have high fees.
But Denovan can see the potential for mis-selling.
"This market could get hyped up because it is allowing super
funds to do something they have not been able to do before.
Australians are hardwired to gear into residential real
estate."
Asgard, the wealth management division of St George Bank, is
working on a modification of its margin loan that will be marketed
to SMSF trustees. The executive heading the project, Dean Thomas,
says he cannot understand all the panic about super funds
borrowing.
"There is no question that borrowing is a long-term wealth
creation strategy and has been used successfully by investors for
many years to accelerate their wealth accumulation," he says.
"What we need to keep in mind is that we have a retirement
savings gap. There are still very few people in this country who
retire with enough in their super funds to generate a comfortable
retirement income. One way to get your investments working harder
is through gearing."
He, too, argues that one of the strengths of a regime that
allows funds to borrow and not just invest through geared funds is
that they can choose the appropriate gearing for their risk
tolerance.
What the products look like and what they cost
Self-managed super fund loans tend to have lower loan-to-value
ratios than standard mortgages and higher interest rates. And costs
are higher because the asset being acquired must be held by a
security trustee during the term of the loan.
Some lenders include a trustee service in the package, while
others do not. A number of law firms have trustee packages. Some
lenders do have product rulings but Gadens Lawyers partner Jon
Denovan recommends that self-managed super fund trustees get some
independent tax advice before borrowing for their fund.
Macquarie Bank Macquarie Relationship Banking is offering a 9
1/2 -year interest-only loan at 10.95 per cent with a maximum
loan-to-value ratio of 55 per cent. The property will be held by a
trustee until final payment is made. The trustee is appointed by
Macquarie. The loan is limited recourse. Borrowers must enter into
a property management agreement with a manager appointed by
Macquarie. The minimum loan is $165,000, borrowers pay a $3000
application fee and a administration fee of 0.25 per cent a year.
The lender does not require a personal guarantee.
Westpac Unlike other offerings, which are highly structured,
Westpac's offering is a modification of an existing loan. The bank
has written new lending policies for a couple of commercial loans
that will allow them to be sold to super funds investing in
property. The loan is non-recourse. The maximum loan-to-value ratio
is 72 per cent for residential and 63 per cent for commercial
property. The members are required to give personal guarantees.
Westpac is offering the loan under its own name and also the BT
Financial Group brand. Its rate for a residential investment loan
is about 10.55 per cent.
Seiza Capital Seiza's Self-Managed Super Fund Loan has the
highest loan-to-value ratios in the market - 85 per cent for
residential and 75 per cent for commercial properties. Borrowers
must give a personal guarantee and are expected to arrange their
own security trustee. Loans are available for terms up to 25 years.
The rate is negotiable.
Calliva Group Calliva's SuperAccess loan is a 20-year
principal-and-interest mortgage. The lender has recourse only to
the property and no personal guarantees are required. The variable
rate is 10.8 per cent. The maximum loan-to-valuation ratio is 70
per cent. It can be used only to buy commercial property. An
establishment fee of 1.5 per cent of the value of the loan is
credited to the borrower's account once it is settled. To establish
a security trustee, Calliva provides a trust deed for a $2750 fee
and the borrower nominates the trustee.