moneymanager.com.au
Home Investing Banking Property Planning News My Portfolios

News


What's in a name? Children's futures

George Cochrane | July 17 2005 | The Sydney Morning Herald & The Age (subscribe)

Could you take further your recent advice to the 75-year-old grandmother with questions about her will? I am wondering why you advised that shares and investments given to children under 18 should be held in the grandmother's name alone, rather than in joint names the grandmother's and the individual grandchild's. I have 12 grandchildren aged two to 30. All have already had a handout, though the very young ones' investments are in their mother's name. I chose insurance bonds, shares and a managed fund (joint with me), while one used the money for mortgage reduction and another for paying out HECS debt. M.W.If money is gifted to children under 18, they are taxed highly on any income above $416, raised to $772 by the use of the $235 low income earner offset. The latter figure represents a 5 per cent return on about $15,400.

If they receive the money from a deceased estate, they are taxed on it at adult rates, which makes it more tax efficient but deprives you of the pleasure of seeing their reaction.

I'm all in favour of giving money to over-18s on the proviso that they invest rather than spend. But they usually don't see it that way as young adults can always use extra money and generally need to spend it rather than save it.

Keep on with what you are doing, it seems to be working well!

Take a trip and relax

MY husband and I are approaching 70. We have a family company which owns the three residential properties that supply our income. We would like to dispose of the company, which owes us $500,000. We like the security of property but we have been advised we must sell the houses to end the company. Is there a more cost-effective way to implement our objective, so we can retire? M.H.You ask a very complex question and, if you don't like what you're hearing from one source of tax advice, get another one, if only to confirm what the first one is saying.

Certainly, to wind down the company, you would need to sell or transfer its assets so it may be cheaper to keep it going for a while longer. Besides, why would you sell all three properties at once? Why not sell one and go for a long, luxurious trip? When the money runs out, sell another!

· If you have a question for George, forward it to Personal Investment, PO Box 3001, Tamarama, 2026.

Printer friendly version  Printer friendly version      Email to a friend  Email to a friend


top



Advertise with us | Contact us | Site map | About us
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Membership Agreement

Copyright © 2005. Any unauthorised use or copying prohibited.

News
 » Making plans when every day's a gift
 » Put your house in order

Full news index

specials
Advertisement
It's tax time . In Moneymanager's tax special, you will find a wealth of information including articles and tools to help you get the most out of your return.
See previous specials.

eNewsletter
Let our enewsletter Money Sense help you with your finances. Subscribe now.
See sample newsletter

Calculators
Estate Planning

Insurance disputes

Super, the Basics

Power of Attorney?

More...

Help

Helpful Links
Financial planning association
For information on financial planners to assist with your investments.
National Information Centre on Retirement Investments
To obtain independent advice on retirement savings investment.
ATO
For comprehensive information on all taxation issues for individuals and businesses.